Clairvoyance & clairaudience
Perceiving what is hidden, by inner seeing or inner hearing, with no sender.
How well tested: Some lab studies
This measures how much it has been tested, not whether it is real.
-
1 · What it is
Clear seeing, clear hearing
Clairvoyance, French for “clear seeing”, is the claim of perceiving an object or an event hidden from the senses: a card face down, the contents of a sealed box, something happening in another place. Clairaudience, “clear hearing”, is the same claim through inner hearing: a voice or a sound rather than an image.
The difference from telepathy is that nobody needs to know the answer. In a clairvoyance test the target is hidden from everyone, so there is no mind for the information to come from.
-
2 · How people practise it
Cards, objects and readings
The classic practice is guessing hidden cards, one after another, and keeping score. Some people “read” objects, holding a sealed item or a photograph and describing whatever comes.
Mediumship is the claim that the information comes from a person who has died. Mediums describe what they see or hear, and this is where clairaudience is most often claimed: a voice that gives a name or a phrase.
-
3 · What the labs tested
Zener cards at Duke
In the early 1930s J. B. Rhine at Duke University ran thousands of card-guessing trials with Zener cards: five symbols (circle, cross, wavy lines, square and star), five of each in a pack of 25. Guessing at random gets one card in five, a hit rate of 20%. In his 1934 book Rhine reported some people scoring well above that over long runs.
Recent work has moved to mediumship under blinded conditions. In a 2015 study, mediums read for people who had died without meeting the sitters, and sitters scored readings without knowing which one was meant for them. The authors reported that sitters rated their own readings higher than the decoys.
-
4 · Where it’s contested
Loose early controls
Rhine’s early card tests were run with looser controls than later work demanded, and the high scores were harder to find as the controls tightened. That pattern, strong early results that shrink under stricter tests, is the centre of the general critique of psi research.
The blinded mediumship results come mostly from a small number of research groups, and independent replication is still thin.
On clairaudience the honest answer is that there is almost no controlled research. It is claimed mostly within mediumship, and studies of mediums test whether the information is accurate, not whether it arrived as a sound.
Sources
3 · What the labs tested
- Rhine, 1934: Extra-Sensory Perception
- Beischel and others, 2015: blinded readings rated above decoys
4 · Where it’s contested
- Reber and Alcock, 2020: the general critique